← Back to the list of projects

City of Ann Arbor SSWWEP - Citizens Advisory Committee Coordination — City of Ann Arbor

2.86 -C- University of Michigan, MUNGER Graduate Dormitory, number of FDD credits, calculations, etc.

Posted by Lori Byron on 22 Dec, 2013
Category: Category 2 - about potential recommendations

Frank Burdick’s Log Number: 66
Submitted by: Burdick log
Category (1,2,3): 2
Status: Open
Estimated date to address: TBD, CAC to prioritize

Q. University of Michigan, MUNGER Graduate Dormitory (former Blimpie Burger location)

a.      What are the results of the FDD (Footing Drain Disconnect) Calculation Work Sheet for the Munger dormitory building? Please provide the calculations, number of FDD credits, and distribution of credits for this development.
b.     What is the ratio of residents to the number of toilets/showers in the proposed design?
c.     What is the anticipated peak flow output of sanitary discharge from this building?
d.     What was the estimated total peak flow output from the structures formally occupying the footprint of the new proposed Munger dormitory.

Comments

Lori Byron on 24 Jan, 2014:

[CITY]: Answers to the above questions are shown on Exhibit Q.2.86 [attached] which are the FDD calculation work required to be submitted for the City’s review and approval for proposed development projects.

Frank Burdick on 29 Jan, 2014:

please answer the questions directly with data. The attachment is not all that readable and certainly not decipherable to those not familiar with this type of presentations.  Also, the chart appears to present flow data in GPD in lieu of GPM.... please revise.

Lori Byron on 5 Feb, 2014:

[CITY] Pages 17-18 in the enclosed “DOM Guidelines.PDF” provides a sample calculation of how FDDs are computed for a development proposal. 

Frank Burdick on 5 Feb, 2014:

Frank Burdick Tue, 28 Jan at 11:24pm
AGAIN:  

please answer the questions directly with data. The attachment is not all that readable and certainly not decipherable to those not familiar with this type of presentations.  Also, the chart appears to present flow data in GPD in lieu of GPM.... please revise.