A request was made for the City's original RFP for this study.  I had it handy, so I am uploading it.  There were 4 addendum's.  I have uploaded 3 of them - Addendum 3 was a scanned copy of a 2007 CDM report that is a very large file that I can't upload from my current location.  If this is critical to review for this request, I can upload it later.

Please note - this request was made in the context of questioning the scope of the SSWWEP and whether recent work performed by the OHM team was covered under change orders or included in the original RFP.  This does not seem relevant to the mission of this CAC, so for now please consider this voluntary reading for the CAC.  If I am missing how this is relevant to the CAC's mission, please feel free to share.  I have also pasted below the response provided by Nick to these questions, for reference.

----------------

The work that OHM is performing on the DOM video falls within the City’s budget allocation for this project. There has been one change order to date in the OHM contract, which also falls within the approved contingency amount approved by Council. This change order included extension of the duration of several flow meters, and conducting the FDD survey. It is fairly common in a project this complex and with this long duration to include a project contingency for task items that we could not foresee at the project onset. We anticipate that the change order processed to date and potential additional change orders resulting from the DOM video and the FDD investigation work to be performed by OHM will fall within the contingency amount for this project, and therefore will result in the project being completed within the authorized budget.

 

 

That being said, the project DOES have a limited budget, and it will be important that the CAC focus on the central issues that are needed to arrive at a recommendation to Council. Some of the questions in the Q&A log are “parking lot” items that may not be central to the scope of the CAC to support arriving at recommendations.  We will begin discussing a process for addressing these items at the CAC meeting in Thursday. If we do not begin to focus on the central issues for this project, then we will indeed risk exceeding our allocated budget on this project.