← Back to the list of projects

City of Ann Arbor SSWWEP - Citizens Advisory Committee Coordination — City of Ann Arbor

Impact of stormwater flooding on flows to the sanitary sewer

Posted by Lori Byron on 29 Aug, 2014
Category: Category 1 - SSWWEP Questions and Presentations

CAC members: At the August CAC meeting, Jim asked a question about stormwater flooding and it's possible impact on the sanitary sewer capacity. Below is an expanded response.

Q. Some areas around the City experience extensive stormwater flooding. If that flooding was eliminated or reduced, would it decrease the flow to the sanitary sewer, and eliminate the need to perform FDD? Has this ever been studied?

A. [CITY]

Footing drain flow is generated from an area near the house where stormwater runoff and ground water are captured and drained to the footing drain.  For stormwater runoff, this is generally a small area directly around the house, perhaps on the order of 5-20 feet from the foundation, depending on the grading and slopes around the house. This is why proper grading and extension of roof downspouts away from the house is so important. 
 
There may be some homes where, in a large enough storm, surface flooding reaches the contributing area of a house that generates footing drain flows. However, it is not uncommon for backyard drainage from a number of homes to contribute to footing drain flows at the home located at the lowest elevation if this water cannot flow to the street and enter the stormwater system. In those locations, preventing stormwater from reaching the footing drain contributing area through better grading around these types of homes would reduce the flows to the footing drains during an extensive surface flooding event.  However, the number of houses that occasionally experience this condition are small compared to the large number of houses with footing drains. The majority of footing drain flows are generated from houses without extensive surface flooding issues, where the footing drain flow is generated from the regular house contributing area. 
 
The impact of improving the stormwater system on reducing sanitary sewer flows has not been studied in detail by the City.  However, we do have some anecdotal observations that we may draw conclusions from. Prior to the FDD program, there were several areas around the City that experienced sanitary basement backups without extensive reports of surface flooding occurring (such as the Orchard Hills and Bromley areas).  The significant footing drain flows in these areas were generated from the normal stormwater runoff captured from around the house. Now that FDDs have been competed in these target areas, the risk of sanitary basement backups has been greatly reduced, to the point where additional FDDs are not recommended. Additionally, on June 27, 2013, the City experienced a very large storm that produced extensive stormwater surface flooding, and there were very few reports of sanitary basement backups in the City.  
 
Another contributor of flow into the sanitary sewer system is surface flooding in the streets above the sanitary manholes through holes that are used for removing these manholes.  This source of additional flow into the sanitary sewer system was identified several years ago, and the City has installed plugs in many of these manhole holes in locations where flooding has been observed or the official City floodplain map showed flooding should occur for large storms to very cost effectively remove this source of wet weather flow in the sanitary sewer system.  An ongoing study of the stormwater system is identifying additional localized surface flooding locations where these manhole holes should be plugged.  The City is also installing better sealing manholes and solid manhole covers in areas where they are needed as street reconstruction or resurfacing is being performed. 
 
These observations suggest that the footing drain flow generated from surface flooding that approaches the house is not a significant source of wet weather flows into the sanitary sewer system. That is not to say that these surface flooding issues are not important - it simply means that the main driver for addressing them should be to address the surface flooding problems, and not because of excessive flows in the sanitary sewer system.
 
While the reduction of surface flooding in some areas may cause a small reduction in the flows into the sanitary sewer system, the flow evaluation and modeling performed has shown that sufficient flows have been removed, and that additional FDDs are not necessary in these areas. 

Comments

Darren McKinnon on 1 Sep, 2014:

This is probably the engineer in me but I thought it was worth sharing.  I seems to me that it would behoove this group to provide objective data whenever possible as opposed to using subjective terms. 

For instance, the 6/27/2013 storm event is characterized as "a very large storm" with "very few reports of sanitary basement backups".  The data taken from the links below indicate that the storm produced 1.44 inches of rain over ~4 hours and that equates to roughly a 1-2 year storm event. I am assuming that the city records can tell us exactly how many backups were reported.  They city may also have better rainfall data.  Given the technical nature of the work, I feel we should use data to support statements whenever possible.

http://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/KARB/2013/6/27/DailyHistory.html?req_city=NA&req_state=NA&req_statename=NA&MR=1

http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_map_cont.html?bkmrk=mi

Robert Czachorski on 2 Sep, 2014:

Thanks, Darren. The CAC group spent quite a bit of time previously reviewing details of the June 27, 2013 storm event, including the rainfall frequencies and flow frequencies. We have probably taken for granted the large magnitude of the storm and it is a good idea for a quick refresher on the details of that event.

The storm event was one of the largest rain events that the City experienced in recent years.  It caused extensive flooding in several portions of the City.  Some photos of the flooding are contained in this Ann Arbor News article:

http://www.annarbor.com/news/severe-thunderstorms-roll-through-washtenaw-county/

The magnitude of the storm event varied across the City as shown in the attached file: "June 27 storm spatial variation - excerpt from August 2013 CAC meeting presentation.pdf". In some parts of the City, the event was less than an inch, and in other parts of the City, it was almost 3 inches. The rainfall measured at the various gauges during our flow metering program was outlined in the Flow Metering Report.  That report quantified the the intensity at the Barton Pond gauge, which varied from less than 1-year to a 10-year event, depending on the rainfall duration examined.  These are shown in the attached file: "June 27 2013 Rainfall - excerpt from Flow Metering Report.pdf".  The full Flow Metering Report is available here:

https://ohm.basecamphq.com/projects/11735993-city-of-ann-arbor-sswwep-citizens-advisory-committee-co…

The spring of 2013 was wetter than average and the June 27, 2013 storm event occurred on relatively wet soil conditions.  This is important, because the flow rates in the sanitary sewer system have a larger reaction to rainfall when the preceding soil conditions are wet. Because the June 27, 2013 storm occurred on relatively wet antecedent moisture conditions, it produced peak flow rates in the sanitary sewer system that were between a 10-year and a 100-year recurrence interval peak flow rate.  This magnitude of the peak flow rate in the sanitary sewer system from this storm event were quantified at each flow meter in the Flow Evaluation Report. An excerpt from this report is shown in the attached file: "June 27 2013 storm flow frequencies - excerpt from Flow Evaluation Report.pdf".  The full Flow Evaluation Report is available here:

https://ohm.basecamphq.com/projects/11735993-city-of-ann-arbor-sswwep-citizens-advisory-committee-co…

We believe the fact that the City did not experience any sanitary basement backups from this events is quite astounding, and is good evidence of the effectiveness of the FDD program at removing peak flows from the sanitary sewer system.  The subsequent analysis that we performed in the Flow Evaluation Report quantified this using three independent, scientific methods and came to a similar conclusion. Given that there was extensive surface flooding during the June 27, 2013 event, without sanitary basement backups, suggests anecdotally, that the contribution of surface water flooding to the remaining footing drains in the system is not a source of inflow and infiltration that is significant enough to cause sanitary basement backups in those areas that experienced the surface flooding.

I hope this helps!  Please feel free to give me a call if you want to discuss some of these background materials in detail.  My cell is 734-635-5398.

Take care,
Robert

Darren McKinnon on 3 Sep, 2014:

Robert-
Thanks for all this info. I remember the storm, it was “very large”. The map with the various rain gauge locations and readings is helpful and shows the variability of the event. When referencing this event, I feel we should quantify it as it was measured. Something like “the storm event ranged from less than 1 year to a 10 year in different parts of the city”. Our report will be read by many people for years to come who will not have the benefit of all the data. It is important to stay objective and present the data we have.

Darren McKinnon, PE

First Martin Corporation
115 Depot Street<x-apple-data-detectors://1/0>
Ann Arbor, MI 48104<x-apple-data-detectors://1/0>
Office: 734 994 5050<tel:734%20994%205050>
Mobile: 734 904 5044<tel:734%20904%205044>
Fax: 734 761 6151<tel:734%20761%206151>
Website: www.firstmartin.com<https://connect.emailsrvr.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=85Scy_O460-kxTK1Kw2WIToX520gbtAICWyNfAx44Ij5kztVl-V48wVJraf8iCoPejHKKIHZaEs.&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.firstmartin.com%2f>
Email: dmckinnon@firstmartin.com<https://connect.emailsrvr.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=85Scy_O460-kxTK1Kw2WIToX520gbtAICWyNfAx44Ij5kztVl-V48…>